Supporting Policy Definition in the e-Health domain: a QCA based method

Spagnoletti, Paolo and Albano, Valentina and Caccetta, Attilio and Tarquini, Rocco and D'Atri, Alessandro (2011) Supporting Policy Definition in the e-Health domain: a QCA based method. In: HEALTHINF 2011 - International Conference on Health Informatics, 26-29 January 2011, Roma.

[img]PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
841Kb

Abstract/Index

eHealth is broadly considered as a promising strategy to improve the economic sustainability and quality of the healthcare service provision in Europe. Nevertheless, despite the enthusiastic declarations of eHealth potential, the adoption of IT in health care has progressed very slowly. A critical factor, not deeply addressed in literature, is related to the process of prioritization of the eHealth solution to adopt, in presence of financial constrains, external and internal pressure from a wide range of heterogeneous stakeholders, and conflicting information on different technological solutions. In this paper we introduce a method supporting policy definition in the eHealth domain. This method is based on a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) of best practices and previous experiences performed through the lens of an analytic framework whose dimensions and categories are well situated in the eHealth context. This method could support policy-makers in the identification of the properties and characteristics of innovative projects at European level and to analyze the gap between the international scenario and the local context in order to understand trends and dynamics of development, to evaluate the best opportunities for innovation and, therefore, to assign priorities for the next investments by respecting the constraints of available resources.

References

Bates, D. W. 2005. “Physicians and Ambulatory Electronic Health Records”. Health Affairs Cronqvist, L. 2005. Tosmana – Tool for small-n analysis. Version 1.201. Marburg:University of Marburg. http://www.tosmana.net/ [cited 2010-10-18]. Dixon B. E. 2007. A roadmap for the adaptation of eHealth. E-Service Journal European Commission, 2004. eHealth - making healthcare better for European citizens: An action plan for a European eHealth Area. Brussels, 30 April 2004. European Commission, 2007. eHealth Taskforce report 2007-Accelerating the development of the ehealth market in Europe, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. European Commission, 2008 Information Society and Media Directorate-Genaral. Expert Impact Assessment http://kb.good-ehealth.org/search.do European Commission, 2009. Good eHealth Report-eHealth in Action Good Practice in European Countries, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. European Commission, COM, 2010. 245 final. A Digital Agenda for Europe, Brussels, 19 May 2010. Galunic, D. C., and Eisenhardt, K. M. 1994. Reviewing the strategy-structure-performance paradigm. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16: 215–255. Gartner, 2008. Hype Cycle for Healthcare Provider Applications and Systems, Stamford. IANS, 2007. Guide to Regional Good Practice eHealth, Brussels, eris@-The European Regional Information Society Association. Miller, D. 1992. Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organization Science, 3: 159–178. Mitchell J., 2000. Increasing the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine by embracing e-health. J Telemed Telecare Mongan, J.J. Ferris, T. G. Lee, T. H. 2008. Options for Slowing the Growth of Health Care Costs. The New England Journal of Medicine, 358(14):1509-1514 Pomerleau, J., Knai C. and Nolte E., 2008. The burden of chronic disease in Europe in Nolte, E. and McKee, M., 2008, Caring for people with chronic diseases: a health system perspective, Maidenhead, Open University Press, pp. 15–43. Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press. Ragin, C. C. 2006. Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and courage. Political Analysis, 14: 291–310. RAND Europe and Capgemini Consulting, 2010. Business Models for eHealth, Cambridge: final report prepared for ICT for the Health Unit, DG Information Society and Media European Commission. Rigby M., 2006. Essential prerequisites to the safe and effective widespread roll-out of e-working in healthcare. International Journal of Medical Informatics 75(2): 138-147. Simon, S.R., Kaushal, R., Cleary, P.D., Jenter, C.A., Volk, L.A., Poon, E.G., et al. 2007. “Correlates of Electronic Health Record Adoption in Office Practices: A Statewide Survey” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Spagnoletti P. 2010. "Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Conducting Multiple Case Study Research: Concept and Discussion," Proceedings > Proceedings of IFIP 8.2/Organizations and Society in Information Systems (OASIS), Pre-ICIS Workshop, 12 December, Saint Louis, Missouri, US Stroetmann, K.A., Jones, T. Dobrev, A. and Veli, N.O., 2006. eHealth is worth it: the economic benefits of implemented eHealth solutions at ten European sites, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Commission. World Health Organization, 2005, Preventing Chronic Disease: a vital investment. WHO Press, Geneva.

Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Lecture)
Research documents and activity classification:Conference Items > International Conferences > Uninvited Submissions
Divisions:Department of Business and Management > CeRSI (Information Systems Research Centre)
Uncontrolled Keywords:eHealth policy, Qualitative comparative analysis, Set-theoretic method.
MIUR Scientific Area:Area 13 - Economics and Statistics > SECS-P/10 Business Organisation
Deposited By:Paolo Spagnoletti
Deposited On:02 Oct 2012 15:15
Last Modified:02 Oct 2012 15:15

Repository Staff Only: item control page